Dr. Phil Exclusive Q&A Featured in the LA Times

Q: How did you get so successful in treating those suffering from the most difficult to treat pain syndromes?

For over 15 years, I had traveled the world doing a lot of research into combining traditional and alternative treatments for those suffering from severe pain. While working as a medical missionary in Central America I first experimented combining phototherapy with acupuncture and got decent results. I then ran 2 pain clinics in Korea where I treated the U.S. Army, Air Force, and Special Forces Personnel.

Furthermore, I decided to travel to Europe to further my studies in chiropractic sports medicine and was invited to treat Olympic athletes at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. During that time I had teamed up with the other sports doctors and we combined Eastern and Western medical procedures and got great results.

I also was solicited to treat entertainers on tour such as Beyonce, & the Pussy Cat Dolls due to the reputation of getting performers back on stage as soon as possible when injured. It was very rewarding to contribute to getting the soldiers back on their missions, the athletes back to competition, and entertainers back on stage.

After all my research which spanned four continents, I came to the conclusion that although the combination of allopathic and alternative therapies benefited most of the population, there were always those stubborn cases that did not respond to either drugs, injections, surgery, or even conservative therapies such as physical therapy, acupuncture, chiropractic, etc. I knew there had to be something else to offer these folks suffering from stubborn pain.

Q: How did you get into Laser Medicine?

Upon returning to the United States, low and behold, I had injured my back doing vigorous cross fit exercises and was diagnosed with a herniated disc and sciatica. The pain was so bad I could not even drive more than 30 minutes without the sharp electrical like pain shooting down my buttock and leg. Needless to say I had tried everything from spinal decompression to chiropractic but nothing had relieved it.

I also did not consider surgery an option. Fortunately, I had discovered class IV hi-powered laser therapy and within a few weeks the sciatic pain had disappeared and I was totally cured! Incidentally I had also suffered from a bad case of shingles which caused severe peripheral neuropathic pain in my back, buttocks, and groin. I had even developed some neuropathic numbness and tingling in my lateral foot and ankle.

Again, it was the laser therapy which saved the day for me. That disc and neuropathy I had turned out to be a blessing in disguise as I had finally discovered the holy grail of non-invasive pain management through using hi-powered class IV laser medicine.

Q: How does the laser work to treat degenerative discs, spinal stenosis, and peripheral neuropathies?

To keep it simple, the laser increases the healing response by delivering photonic energy to damaged discs, soft tissue, and nerves through a process called photobiomodulation. ATP, Oxygen, and blood are delivered to damaged tissue which decreases inflammation and speeds circulation and healing. And just as sunlight produces vitamin D3 when it is absorbed by the skin to make strong bones, the laser energy does the same thing on a more focused level.

Q: What makes your class IV laser different from others?

The ability of the laser to deliver sufficient photonic energy in deep tissue is proportionate to the laser’s power. And power is measured in watts. Most class IV lasers only produce 6 to 12 watts of photonic energy. Our Lifelite Lrx60K Laser delivers a whopping 60 watts, thus is 5 to 10 times more powerful than any other laser out there. Thus we get deeper and more powerful healing laser energy into the tissue resulting in shortened treatment times and superior clinical results.

Q: Is the class IV hi powered laser therapy covered by insurance and Medicare?

When I came back to the U.S. I played the insurance game and billed Medicare and private insurances for our therapies and found that they either refused to pay, or did not cover the laser procedures at all. I felt frustrated that the insurance companies and government run Medicare tied my hands as a doctor and I could not deliver the proper care that my patients desperately needed.

So I got out of the insurance industry and decided to create the concierge clinic concept where the patients would pay a fair fee to us directly which would allow the patient to get the care they needed, and in return we would be able to deliver superior hi-quality health care, without the red tape of dealing with insurances. This would benefit both parties as our staff time could now be 100% devoted to the patient instead of wasting time and resourced fighting the insurance companies resulting in patient and practitioner frustration.

Furthermore, other costly procedures such as Lasik and dental implants are not covered by insurances, but people still invest in these services because you can’t put a price on a healthier and higher quality of life which these procedures provide.

Q: Can you tell us about any successful cases of patients who have undergone your laser procedure?

Sure, we had Dr. Renaldo Landero M.D., a famous Geriatric Specialist from Carson who came in with severe neck and neuropathic arm pain from degenerated discs in his cervical spine. His pain was significantly reduced after only a few hi-powered laser treatments.

We also had Carla Visnic, a registered nurse who came in with crippling peripheral neuropathy pain and tingling in her feet for over 20 years and had been taking Lyrica, Cymbalta, and Gabapentin with no relief. After just 3 treatments with the 60 watt laser her pain scale dropped from a 10 to a 6, and she got feeling back in her feet.

The other day Tyler, who is a 3rd baseman for the Baltimore Orioles came in with carpal tunnel wrist pain, especially when batting, so he was worried he would be cut from the upcoming season. He had some injections and physical therapy from his team doctors but nothing helped. His wrist was so bad he could not even do a pushup due to the wrist pressure. But after one laser treatment his pain was relieved and he was able to do multiple pushups and it looks like he will be playing this season.

Q: How available is the class IV Lrx60K hi-powered laser procedure to those suffering from chronic pain?

The problem is that because we are the only 60 watt class IV laser provider on the entire West Coast, we have no choice but to limit the amount of cases we take. If we take too many, the quality of our care would drop, and we refuse to compromise our 5 star quality of care standards.

So to make the Lrx60K hi-powered laser available to more chronic pain sufferers, I am starting a Laser Medicine University where I will be training other doctors on our state-of-the-art laser medicine protocols and how to implement the concierge clinic client centered concept.

Q: What other conditions can be treated with the hi-powered Lrx60K laser?

We have had excellent results with treating those suffering from fibromyalgia, carpal tunnel, shingles postherpatic neuralgia, golfer’s/tennis elbow, tendinitis and tendinosis of the shoulder, and a host of other nerve, joint, muscular, inflammatory and degenerative disorders.

Please keep in mind that like any medical procedure the laser is not a cure all and we often refer or co-manage difficult cases with other medical professionals. In fact at our Newport clinic we share office space with Dr. Jacobs who is a senior neurologist and Dr. Lee who is a general surgeon both with Hoag Hospital privileges. This ensures that our patients can have access to the best doctors around.

Q: What should chronic sufferers do?

If you or someone you know has a sport, spine, or neuropathy disorder, Dr. Phil invites you to contact him today to find out if you are a candidate for the highest powered laser procedure.

You may request a free information package now by calling directly: 714-636-2741, or by visiting our special information request website www.lasermedinstitute.com or for an appointment for a consultation* with Dr. Phil call our concierge at: 866-867-9562 or go to www.theconciergeclinic.com

*(Mention the LA Times reader code: MTD0326 and get a discount off your first consultation. Limited appointments are available. You are encouraged to call now before being put on a long waiting list.)

Dr. Phil Treats Back Pain

Dr. Phil demos the new LifeLight 60 watt Laser Pain Therapy Device.

Dr. Phil at the Cross Fit Games

I’m a huge CrossFit fanatic. I work out daily doing my Workout of the Day (WOD). I’m also an official level 1 crossfit trainer. Here’s a picture of me with another doctor at the 2010 cross fit games.

Is there a difference between spinal decompression traction brands?

YES and NO:

Our Kennedy Neuroflex Decompression Traction System has the widest availability of patient positioning options of ANY systems that we investigated. Patients may lay on their back (supine), on their stomach (prone), side lying, gentle inversion, supine extension or supine flexion, prone flexion or prone extension, side lying straight or with lateral bending. Due to the wide accessibility of positioning options we are able to adapt the table positions to the most comfortable / most relaxing position for our patients in pain. What does this mean for YOU? The more relaxed you are during the therapy, the more relaxed the spinal muscles in the area of injury are, the greater quantity of disc decompression is achieved. This means faster reductions in pain, more comfortable treatments, less traction force required, faster disc healing, and LESS COST.

Our Technology
Kennedy Neuro-Flex Decompression Traction System

Different brands of decompression traction tables are like different brands of automobiles. ALL decompression systems are a traction based system that uses a harness attached to a pulley to gently pull the damaged tissue to create a negative pressure to the targeted disc. Neuro-flex tables just have more positioning options available and the computer is significantly more customizable for individual patient situations .

Certain other brands (The VAX-D and the DRX9000) are the most limited in regards to patient selection and comfort. With the DRX9000, patients are limited to supine positioning (laying on their back) only. The VAX-D limits patient positioning to prone laying (face down on their stomach) only. Because of the effects of gravity on an injured disc, patients with other complicating conditions such as acid reflux, varying body shapes, surgical histories or “enhancements,” other injuries, or the actual mechanics of the injured disc, these limited patient positioning options can complicate the application of spinal decompression therapy. This means less comfort, more traction force required, more treatments, and higher cost.

Certain brands have trademarked the phrase “true decompression” which I find to be quite misleading to the public. Decompression is a function of the disc…not a table, the table is a mechanism of traction. Frankly, the FDA has the same concern because ALL of the brands of Decompression Traction Systems are Cleared by the FDA to perform “traction.” Unique pull patterns are better decided by an experienced doctor who has evaluated you and customized your treatment rather than a computer that treats all cases of disc herniations the same (cookie cutter approach). Most research regarding non-surgical spinal decompression has been performed using the VAX-D protocols (prone protocols and pull patterns using a percentage of body weight and contraction and rest phase pull patterns), and since most symptomatic disc bulges are oriented towards the posterior elements of the disc this is a more commonly positioned orientation for our patients with “radicular” symptoms (nerve symptoms progressing down the leg). The DRX9000 brand manufacturer (AXIOM Worldwide) has advised their practitioners to adopt the clinical trial results and have claimed them as their own even though the patient positioning is significantly different from the VAX-D system protocols.

Our concerns with many decompression traction providers is that they use a “one size fits all” protocol which we find to be too intense without any increased therapeutic benefit. Decompression performed at 50% of the body weight (for the lumbar spine) for 30 minutes has not been shown to have any increased therapeutic benefit when compared to our 12 – 15 minute program at 35% of the body weight. The more intense program used by our competitors has an increased risk of a “traction reaction (back spasm response)” than our more gentle program with no increased therapeutic benefit and it generally costs significantly more.
Even though some table systems do have limitations with variable positioning options, the patient improvements are generally impressive if correctly applied.

You can find the original article source here: http://www.spinediscdecompression.com/15201.html

What is the Difference Between Chiropractic and Spinal Decompression?

Chiropractic Adjustments are designed to be high velocity (fast) adjustments with low amplitude (small motions) designed to correct the loss of normal position and or motion of two or more spinal levels.  In many cases they can help alleviate the symptoms of many sources of back pain by reducing muscle spasms, increasing normal range of motion, increasing disc flexibility, and by flushing inflammatory chemicals from the injured area.  Unfortunately, some Chiropractic adjustments may create some degree of shearing force on the injured disc which may aggravate an unstable disc.  Chiropractic adjustments do not increase disc height whereas Spinal Decompression Traction can.    Our general rule of thumb is at the beginning of Spinal Decompression we only “instrument adjust” to reduce the shearing force on the disc if indicated.  Our patients find it to be more comfortable and we find it more specific in vertebral level contact.
After the disc has stabilized the Chiropractic adjustments may be performed by hand if indicated.

 

Original Article: http://www.spinediscdecompression.com/15201.html

What is the Difference between Physical Therapy vs. Spinal Decompression?

This is a misleading question because Spinal Decompression traction is a Modality whereas Physical Therapy is a system of modalities.

Some physical therapists use traction, some perform spinal decompression traction, some do active rehabilitation, some do only passive rehabilitation, some do more than one of the above.

Spinal Decompression Traction can be performed by Medical Doctors, Chiropractors, and physical therapists. This modality is not taught as a general curriculum in medical school, chiropractic school, or physical therapy school. It is ideally learned as an elective post graduate program, although most practitioners learn it by a basic in-service training from the manufacturer.

There are numerous physical therapy offices in the area offering pelvic traction that will try to convince you that it is the same as spinal decompression, and our patients have commented that they have had mediocre benefits from the therapy. Once we evaluated their individual case we have almost always found issues with the patient positioning being somewhat uncomfortable or inappropriate for the patient, too long of a treatment time (potential for creation of basic pelvic/cervical traction muscle guarding or spasm) or too long of a pull duration especially if not using variable pull forces ie. setting the pull for 1/3 body weight for 15 minutes. These situations can be from limitations of the equipment, but more likely evidence of a minimally trained technician applying therapy. Once we thoroughly evaluated these patients and corrected the treatment protocols, their results were significantly improved.

Article Source: http://www.spinediscdecompression.com/15201.html

Innovative Back Pain Treatment

We can treat people two ways for back pain on the decompression tables.

Position for Anterior disc herniations & spinal stenosis.

The KDT Table System is the only Decompression System featuring Bolser-less leg elevation with Pelvic Tilt which pre-tensions posterior elements. The KDT system allows simultaneous and table Y-axis distraction. The Passive Tensioning Reactive Orthopedic Spring controls X-axis Table motion, Now you can enhance decompression without the danger of increased force. Tension can be matched specifically to patient morphology. Upper section pivots at L-5 for true upper body Semi-Fowler Positioning (supine) as described in the Kennedy Decompression Technique which allows deep flexion to create the mechanical positioning necessary to help centralize “atypically migrating” posterior discs. A lateral motor mount slide allows laterlization of pull for lateral hernia, scoliosis and facet syndromes.

Position for posterior lumbar disc herniations

The KDT Table System with Neural-Flex Technology is the first Decompression System which adds the capability of advanced treatment of nerve and foraminal encroachment syndromes as well as a new option for patients suffering with spinal stenosis.

Only the KDT neural-flex technology maintains an axial pull vector while allowing the patient’s lower torso to be dropped into deep flexion. The flexion caudal section is fully powered for effortless transition to the pain relieving position.

KDT Neural-Flex Technology can be used for traditional manual flexion mobilizations as well.

Innovative Neck Pain Treatment

 

Position for Cervical Disc Herniations

The KDT Table System provides improved comfort while applying Decompression to the Cervical Spine. The patent pending mid-section elevation allows full support to the lumber spine while lowering Thoracic kyphosis. This biomechanically correct position enables a full range of cervical angulation. Patients with a defined directional preference as described in the Kennedy Decompression Technique, can be positioned appropriately to allow cervical discs to migrate centrally without an increase in muscular tension.

In simpler terms,  what it does is it lightly stretches your neck and spine. This stretching creates a vacuum sensation bringing back the essential nutrients and liquids back into your disc. Ultimately, get you out of pain.

Chiropractic Economics: TREATMENT OF AN L5/S1 EXTRUDED DISC HERNIATION USING A DRX-9000 SPINAL DECOMPRESSION UNIT: A CASE REPORT

Objective: To discuss a case of subacute lumbar discherniation successfully treated with a DRX-9000 spinaldecompression unit.

Clinical Features: A 50-year-old male presented with achief complaint of severe lower back pain and left sidedsciatica persisting for two months. Most orthopedic testingprocedures could not be performed due to the severity ofpain at the time of presentation. Standard radiographs ofthe lumbar spine revealed only some moderate disc spacenarrowing at L5/S1. However, the patient did present amagnetic resonance image (MRI) report with images performedone week prior. The lumbar MR images obtainedwere scanned in a neutral seated (weight-bearing) positionusing an upright unit. The imaging report was written bya chiropractic radiologist and revealed an L5/S1 left paracentraldisc herniation (extrusion) causing posterolateraldisplacement of the left S1 nerve root.

 

Click here to download the the original pdf here: Chiropractic Economics Presents a Case Study on Spinal Decompression

Back Surgery: Too Many, Too Costly, Too Ineffective

 

 

We’re always looking for ways to educate and enlighten our patients. Here’s an interesting article from Dynamic Chiropractic. You can find the original article here along with the rest of the four parts. Links to Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4.

I’ve included the first post here for your convenience.

By J.C. Smith, MA, DC

If the present course for health care does not radically change, America will be financially crippled as President Obama warned: “paying more, getting less, and going broke.”1 As example, recently Blue Shield of California announced its plans to raise rates by as much as 59 percent, and as the bellwether Golden State goes, so does the nation.2

 

Most Americans fail to realize the huge economic impact of the medical industrial complex until they feel the crunch from unpaid medical bills that caused 62 percent of all personal bankruptcies filed in the U.S. in 2007, according to a study by Harvard researchers.3 To the surprise of even the researchers, 78 percent of those filers had medical insurance at the start of their illness, including 60.3 percent who had private coverage, not Medicare or Medicaid.4

 

Dr. David Himmelstein, the lead author of the study and an associate professor of medicine at Harvard, commented: “Unless you’re Bill Gates you’re just one serious illness away from bankruptcy. Most of the medically bankrupt were average Americans who happened to get sick.”

“This study provides further evidence that the U.S. healthcare system is broken,”according to James E. Dalen, MD, MPH.5 The Harvard study underscored President Obama’s argument for health care reform legislation. In a letter to Democratic Senate leaders, the president said:

“Healthcare reform is not a luxury. It’s a necessity we cannot defer. Soaring healthcare costs make our current course unsustainable. It is unsustainable for our families, whose spiraling premiums and out-of-pocket expenses are pushing them into bankruptcy and forcing them to go without the checkups and prescriptions they need.”6

Not only are costs and bankruptcy skyrocketing, so is accountability. During the Obama health care reform debate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it was notable that the medical industrial complex – the American Medical Association (AMA), the HMOs, Big Pharma, and the American Hospital Association – was not called before Congress to explain why there is a health care crisis wrought with high costs and poor outcomes.

Unlike the Detroit auto executives and Wall Street bankers, whose feet were held to the fire at congressional hearings, the medical cartel avoided such public humiliation and offered no explanations. Instead, the medical alliance continued to mislead Congress and the public by claiming to be the “best health care system in the world,” a notion also told all too often by conservative news media. However, the facts belie that claim.

Some pundits claim America has arguably the best doctors, the best medical schools, and the best hospitals. Undoubtedly those many countries whose health statistics are superior to America’s might disagree and argue that high-tech medical diagnostic tools and highly trained surgeons are not the real issues to the health care dilemma. The actual question is, how well does the American health care delivery system really work outside of the operating room?

As the statistics show, inside the operating room is nothing less than a boondoggle. In 2006, doctors performed at least 60 million surgical procedures of all types, one for every five Americans. No other country does nearly as many operations on its citizens.7

Not only are surgeries rampant, but many are also ineffective and dangerous. Barbara Starfield, MD, MPH, of the Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, reported that medical care is now the third-leading cause of death in the U.S., causing 225,000 preventable deaths every year as tools to make them safer go unused.8-9

Over 100,000 people die each year from complications of surgery – far more than die in car crashes; deaths from prescription drugs now rank fourth only to cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, and when added to deaths from botched surgery, over 3,000 Americans die weekly.10 Such deaths accounted for 23 percent of overall deaths in men and 32 percent of deaths in women.11

Not Much Bang for Bucks

It would seem logical that if Americans spend the most on health care and have the best educated doctors, we would have the healthiest citizens and best health care system in the world, but we do not. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2000 the U.S. ranked #1 in cost, #72 in population health, #37 in health care delivery, with 48 million Americans lacking sick-care coverage.12 In contrast, France ranked #4, #4 and #1, with only 1 percent uninsured.13 Obviously the French are getting more bang for their francs than we are getting for our bucks, despite the fear-mongering in the media about socialized medicine.

The present system was described by TIME magazine: “[W]hat a sinkhole the country’s healthcare system has become: the U.S. spends more to get less than just about every other industrialized country.”14 Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, health adviser to President Obama, also addressed the question whether or not America has the best health care in the world, a mistaken belief held by many people:

“Let’s bury this one once and for all. The United States is No. 1 in only one sense: the amount we shell out for health care. We have the most expensive system in the world per capita, but we lag behind many developed countries on virtually every health statistic you can name.”15

To put this cost into perspective, the U.S. spent twice as much on sick-care as it did on food in 2006 and more than China’s 1.3 billion citizens consumed altogether. In addition, the increase in U.S. health care spending in the three-year period is more than the amount U.S. consumers spent on oil and gasoline during all of 2006 when energy prices began to reach new heights.16

These facts did not escape the attention of President Obama: “Today, we are spending over $2 trillion a year on health care – almost 50 percent more per person than the next most costly nation. And yet, for all this spending, more of our citizens are uninsured; the quality of our care is often lower; and we aren’t any healthier. In fact, citizens in some countries that spend less than we do are actually living longer than we do.”17 (Emphasis added)

Back Pain Dilemma

Undoubtedly the annual cost of health care, nearly $2.4 trillion, could be reduced substantially if unnecessary treatments were decreased. Of the Top 10 list of diseases in America, “back pain” stands at number eight, which according to Forbes.com costs over $40 billion annually for treatment costs alone;18 other estimates that include disability, work loss, and total indirect costs range between $100 and $200 billion per year.19 Back pain sent over 3 million people to emergency rooms in 2008 at a cost of $9.5 billion, making it the ninth most expensive condition treated in U.S. hospitals.20

“Work-related musculoskeletal disorders remain the leading cause of workplace injury and illness in this country,” according to OSHA head David Michaels.21 Although not the killer that heart disease or cancer is, crippling back pain is expensive, disabling, and often leads later in life to osteoarthritis, which ranks ahead of back pain on the Top 10 list at $48 billion; when combined, these two musculoskeletal conditions rank fourth on the list at $88 billion.22

Recently a new wave of data by researchers has revealed the high cost and ineffectiveness of most medical back treatments. Yet these revelations have fallen on deaf ears in the medical profession as the use of opioids, epidural steroid injections, and spine surgeries has radically increased despite these warnings.

Ironically, now the chiropractic profession, long ostracized by the medical profession, has emerged as a fiscal conservative to champion this call for reducing costs in health care. Despite the historic medical prejudice, spinal manipulation has now been shown to be the most clinically and cost-effective method for the epidemic of low back pain, which happens to be the single largest cause of disability today.23

According to Pran Manga, PhD, MPhil, health economist, “There is an overwhelming body of evidence indicating that chiropractic management of low back pain is more cost-effective than medical management.”24 He is not alone in his assessment. Numerous international and American studies have shown that for nonspecific back pain, manipulation was heads above all other treatments. In fact, Anthony Rosner, PhD, testified before the Institute of Medicine: “Today, we can argue that chiropractic care, at least for back pain, appears to have vaulted from last to first place as a treatment option.”25

Chiropractic care not only has catapulted to the top of the list for back pain care, chiropractic patients are also extremely positive about their treatments. TRICARE, the health program for military personnel and retirees, has evaluated patients’ response to chiropractic care. The enormously high patient satisfaction rates astounded the TRICARE administrators with scores of 94.3 percent in the Army; the Air Force tally was also high with 12 of 19 bases scoring 100 percent; the Navy also reported ratings of 90 percent or higher; and even the TRICARE outpatient satisfaction surveys (TROSS) rated chiropractors at 88.54, which was 10 percent “higher than the overall satisfaction with all providers” (78.31 percent). But despite these glowing satisfaction rates for chiropractic care, TRICARE continues to limit access to chiropractors at only 42 of 131 military treatment facilities due to an intransigent medical bureaucracy within the Department of Defense.26

Not only are patients well satisfied with chiropractic care, in fact, the more investigators look into this back pain epidemic, the more the medical management has come under attack and, remarkably, that chiropractic treatment has been found best for the vast majority of nonspecific low back and neck pain.

After nearly a century of warfare against the chiropractic profession, defaming it as an “unscientific cult” that deserved to be “eliminated,”27 research now has shown chiropractic care to be very effective and, ironically, now seriously questions the efficacy of the medical management of back pain – opioid drugs, epidural steroid injections, and spine surgery. Indeed, the claim to be unscientific and dangerous now seems to be on the other (medical) foot.

The Call for Restraint in Spine Surgery

It must be bitter medicine to swallow for the medical profession to realize that back surgery “has been accused of leaving more tragic human wreckage in its wake than any other operation in history,” according to Gordon Waddell, DSc, MD, FRCS. As director of an orthopedic surgical clinic for over 20 years in Glasgow, Scotland, he determined: “Low back pain has been a 20th century health care disaster. Medical care certainly has not solved the everyday symptom of low back pain and even may be reinforcing and exacerbating the problem.”28

Richard Deyo, MD, MPH, also mentioned the problems with medical treatments and physician incompetence in diagnosis and treatment of low back treatments: “Calling a [medical] physician a back-pain expert, therefore, is perhaps faint praise – medicine has at best a limited understanding of the condition. In fact, medicine’s reliance on outdated ideas may have actually contributed to the problem.”29

Undoubtedly, another knife in spine surgeons’ backs occurred in 1994 when the U.S. Public Health Service’s Agency for Health Care Policy & Research (AHCPR) conducted the most thorough investigation into acute low back pain in adults and concluded the following finding in its Patient Guide:

“Even having a lot of back pain does not by itself mean you need surgery. Surgery has been found to be helpful in only 1 in 100 cases of low back problems. In some people, surgery can even cause more problems. This is especially true if your only symptom is back pain.30(Emphasis added)

The AHCPR study also concluded that spinal manipulation was the preferred initial professional treatment for acute low back pain. The Patient Guide stated: “This treatment (using the hands to apply force to the back to ‘adjust’ the spine) can be helpful for some people in the first month of low back symptoms. It should only be done by a professional with experience in manipulation.”31

This recommendation was, in effect, an endorsement of chiropractic care, since chiropractors do 94 percent of all spinal manipulation in the U.S.32 After a century of defamation, it was a sweet vindication for the chiropractic profession finally to be endorsed by the U.S. Public Health Service. Of course, the North American Spine Society, consisting primarily of spine surgeons, took a dim view of this precedent and politicked to have the AHCPR’s mission to establish guidelines eliminated with help from Newt Gingrich’s Republican Congress. It should be noted that of the 14 guidelines done by AHCPR, the acute low back pain guideline was the only one attacked by the medical profession.

Despite the medical resistance, these warnings are escalating as the call for restraint is growing from a whisper into a roar. Certainly when leading medical professionals from prestigious universities, journals, and the U.S. Public Health Service openly criticize the onslaught and ineffectiveness of spine surgery, this has become an epidemic of legitimate concern for payers and patients alike.

References

  1. Text of President Obama’s health care speech, June 15, 2009, reprinted by MarketWatch.
  2. Calvan CC.”Blue Shield Stands By California Health Care Premium Hikes.” The Sacramento Bee, Feb. 11, 2011.
  3. Himmelstein DU, Thorne D, Warren E, Woolhandler S. Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: results of a national study. The American Journal of Health, August 2009;122(8):741-746.
  4. Arnst C. “Study Links Medical Costs and Personal Bankruptcy, Harvard Researchers Say 62% of All Personal Bankruptcies in the U.S. in 2007 Were Caused by Health Problems — and 78% of Those Filers Had Insurance.” Business Week, June 4, 2009.
  5. “Harvard Study: 60% of Bankruptcies Caused by Health Problems.” Consumer Affairs, June 4, 2009.
  6. Arnst C, Op Cit.
  7. Gawande A. “The Cost Conundrum.” The New Yorker Magazine, June 1, 2009.
  8. Starfield B. “Is US Health Really the Best in the World?” JAMA, July 26, 2000;284(4):483-485.
  9. Nalder E, Crowley CF. “Patients Beware: Hospital Safety’s a Wilderness of Data. Hearst Newspapers, March 21, 2010.
  10. Gawande A, Op Cit.
  11. Dunham W. “France Best, U.S. Worst in Preventable Death Ranking,” Reuters, Jan. 8, 2008.
  12. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems–Improving Performance, 2000.
  13. Rodwin VG. “The Health Care System Under French National Health Insurance: Lessons for Health Reform in the United States.” Am J Public Health, January 2003;93(1): 31-37.
  14. Tumulty K. “Can Obama Find a Cure?” TIME, Aug. 10, 2009.
  15. Emanuel E, Brownlee S. “Myths About Our Ailing Health-Care System,” Washington Post, Nov. 23, 2008.
  16. Farrell DM, Jensen ES, Kocher B. “Accounting for the Cost of U.S. Health Care: A New Look at Why Americans Spend More.” McKinsey Global Institute, Nov. 8, 2008.
  17. Text, Op Cit.
  18. Van Dusen A. “America’s Most Expensive Medical Conditions,” Forbes.com, Feb. 6, 2008.
  19. Guyer RD. “The Paradox In Medicine Today–Exciting Technology and Economic Challenges.” The Spine Journal, March/April 2008;8(2):279-285.
  20. AHRQ News and Numbers: “Aching Back Sends More Than 3 Million to Emergency Departments.” Feb. 3, 2011.
  21. “Anti-Regulatory Forces Launch Full Assault on Public Protections.” OMB Watch, Feb. 8, 2011.
  22. “Top 10 Most Expensive Treatment-Disease Costs.”www.mostexpensiveworld.com/diseases/top-10-most-expensive-treatment-disease-costs.html
  23. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. “Burden of Major Musculoskeletal Conditions.Bull World Health Organ, 2003;81(9):646-656.
  24. Manga P, Angus D, Papadopoulos C, Swan W. “The Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Chiropractic Management of Low Back Pain.” Funded by the Ontario Ministry of Health, August 1993.
  25. Testimony before the Institute of Medicine: Committee on Use of CAM by the American Public, Feb. 27, 2003.
  26. Chiropractic Care Study, Senate Report 110-335 accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2009; letter sent to Congressmen by Ellen P. Embrey, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, Sept. 22, 2009.
  27. Memo from Robert Youngerman to Robert Throckmorton, Sept. 24, 1963; plaintiff’s exhibit 173, Wilk.
  28. Waddell G, Allan OB. “A Historical Perspective on Low Back Pain and Disability.” Acta Orthop Scand, 1989;60 (suppl 234).
  29. Deyo RA. “Low-Back Pain.” Scientific American, August 1998:49-53
  30. Bigos S, et al. Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 14. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, AHCPR Pub. No. 95-0642; December 1994. Patient Guide, (1992):12.
  31. Ibid, p. 7.
  32. Shekelle PG, et al. RAND Corporation Report: The Appropriateness of Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain.

 

Laser Seminar For Doctors

You may request for a *free laser pain elimination information package mailed or emailed to you by calling our 24 hour pre-recorded information hotline at 1-888-682-5350 or by filling in the order form below.

*$57 value (free to first 50 requests). Order yours now while supplies last.

Required fields *